<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Google set up in the foyer of the New York Public Library?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roberthoge.com/archives/437/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roberthoge.com/archives/437</link>
	<description>Welcome to the website of Robert Hoge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:32:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoger</title>
		<link>http://roberthoge.com/archives/437/comment-page-1#comment-12559</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 12:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roberthoge.com/?p=437#comment-12559</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a fair concern, Ian, which I think at best Google could have communicated better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a fair concern, Ian, which I think at best Google could have communicated better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Golledge</title>
		<link>http://roberthoge.com/archives/437/comment-page-1#comment-12558</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Golledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 02:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roberthoge.com/?p=437#comment-12558</guid>
		<description>However this goes forward, I just can&#039;t get over how Google has got away with massive copyright infringement. Are authors now to believe claims of being fairly treated by this corporate thief?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However this goes forward, I just can&#8217;t get over how Google has got away with massive copyright infringement. Are authors now to believe claims of being fairly treated by this corporate thief?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

